|
|
|
|
|
by mkopec
885 days ago
|
|
I would like to be able to ensure that only boot loaders signed with my private key can be executed. Secure Boot serves that purpose well, can I do that with your approach? Likewise, demand and use cases for network boot exist, otherwise it wouldn't be here. Same goes for every other feature most users would consider bloat. |
|
You can network boot too; just run `busybox udhcpc`.
I think you misread my comment. I never described signature-checking or network boot as bloat. I said it was stupid to have to implement these things twice (once in mainline Linux and then all over again in kooky UEFI-land with its bizzarre API, ABI, and wacky rules).
I still think it is stupid to do that, because it is. We have working, high-quality, battle-tested implementations of all this stuff. Use them.