[BenFranklin100]

Is there a point besides snark? If one chooses to export to Apple Health, HealthKit keeps everything on device or encrypted. Even Apple can’t access the data. I stay away from all 3rd party health trackers since most don’t seem to have any commit to privacy, so this looks like a nice addition to the ecosystem.

[account-5]

I would imagine frustration more than snark. The "... for Apple" clarifications would have saved me clicking on this thread in anticipation of something I could use.

[neilv]

Not snark, but title clarification.

(When I saw "Open-source, privacy oriented, outdoor fitness tracker", I thought it would be available for an open source platform, so I clicked. It being for a closed, all-your-data-are-belong-to-us platform wasn't expected. Maybe the comment saved some clicks.)

[maxhille]

> Even Apple can’t access the data.

They own your device 100%. Of course they can access your data...

[BenFranklin100]

Technically yes, but their policy and business value proposition to the end user says they don’t. it would wipe hundreds of billions of dollars of their worth overnight if it were ever shown Apple was secretly, willfully selling individual’s personal health information. Follow the money.

[Moru]

Since they own the device and OS, they don't need to access your data. They have low-level access to all the sensors/gps.

[jefurii]

Not snark, but I have an Android phone so it's irrelevant to me.