|
|
|
|
|
by cableshaft
881 days ago
|
|
Maybe you're right, I don't know. I still think it will remain a niche novelty for quite some time, though, as it won't be considered authentic enough. NFL has plenty of authentic camera work mixed in with a bit of flair like that (I didn't know they did that now, that's interesting), but I imagine for a wedding they care even more about making sure it's fully accurate and not generated. Maybe I'm wrong, guess we'll see what happens in the next ten years. I do know in my case that we could have gone cheaper on photographers and we didn't, though (we saved money by not getting video or paying for a physical album afterwards, not the people), and I wouldn't be interested in A.I. generating the pictures (even assuming it would be better quality than today) in any way instead of snapping what actually happened. And I'm not someone who's against people using generative A.I. for the most part, so that doesn't have anything to do with my preference. |
|