[Aurornis]

> Are we at this level now? The scheduler performance has nothing to do with the used language.

The whole project is a toy and they’re not trying to hide it. The mention of the language is just a descriptor for the project, not an implication that Rust is faster.

[underdeserver]

"Promising results for gaming performance" is not the kind of phrasing you use for toy projects though.

[loeg]

It's Phoronix, what do you expect? High editorial standards? Phoronix is the one overhyping this toy project, not the developer.

[sidkshatriya]

> It's Phoronix, what do you expect? High editorial standards?

It seems that you're implying that their standards aren't high. Is this a general feel of yours or based on some concrete examples ?

I think that Phoronix does a pretty good job. Its free, has some interesting benchmarks, covers technical topics like the Linux kernel, Graphics, Computer Hardware etc. quite well.

Phoronix gets criticized a bit too much. I don't get it -- maybe someone can explain.

[jedisct1]

I'd have expected more than HN editorial standards.

[underdeserver]

Never heard of them before ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[loeg]

It's a long-running one-man show that is quick to publish sensational, sometimes inaccurate recaps of emails from mailing lists.