[eesmith]

The list of devices is on page 21 (of 33) in the presentation at https://web.archive.org/web/20030315060403/https://www.itu.i... . Seven were optical, four capacitive.

I understand a sufficiently capable attacker may be able to bypass fingerprints.

My question is does the gummy bear method (or really, the gelatin method), still work against most modern fingerprint readers?

Even the 2003 research pointed out, at https://totseans.com/totse/en/bad_ideas/locks_and_security/1... , "If "live and well" detectors can clearly distinguish their moisture, electric resistance, transparency or bubble content (i.e., bubble rich material or not) between live fingers and gummy fingers, fingerprint systems can reject gummy fingers. Also, detection of compliance would be helpful for preventing gummy fingers. Furthermore, some of measures which have been proposed in patent literature may be useful in preventing gummy fingers."

Have those methods been widely integrated to make that 20+ year old method no longer viable?