[logiduck]

I mean this coming from the best way possible with no ill intentions, but you really seem to be missing the mark by releasing a product with very thin utility and "writing" blogs that are surface level GPT fluff.

I wish you all the best on your journey, but it really doesn't seem like you are steering the ship at all. I understand you have the best intentions but the work that you have produced seems to be the very thing you are trying to avoid.

For example,

> The AI quiz generator is designed to supplement educators' existing strategies, offering a time-efficient way to create diverse and challenging material.

An AI quiz generator is very basic rudimentary thing. It is much harder to actually design and implement an educator strategy to efficaciously use AI. You seem to be outsourcing everything to ChatGPT while making no efforts at solving the real problems; the very thing you complain about.

I hope you take this with my sincerest feedback, but you need to do the hard work. Not just generate vapid article with chatGPT and say you are doing research. If you are doing the research, your work that you are presenting doesn't reflect much effort.

[charleduease]

While our current offerings might seem basic to some, they are part of a larger, evolving strategy aimed at integrating AI into education responsibly and effectively.

We're not claiming to have all the answers right now, but we're actively working towards finding them. Dismissing our efforts as mere "outsourcing to ChatGPT" overlooks the broader objective of our work. We're striving to tackle real-world educational challenges, and that includes starting with tools that might seem simple at first glance.

Feedback is crucial, and yours has been noted. But let's not mistake the starting line for the finish.

[mnky9800n]

What real world educational challenges are you attempting to solve?