Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by RadiozRadioz 885 days ago
I would advise against using Word doc format instead of PDF. I feel quite strongly about this.

1. PDF will render more consistently across platforms.

2. PDF can be opened in a web browser. Lots of orgs these days use cloud tools, you can't count on MS Office being universal any more. Also on a phone without additional apps, which is surprisingly common too.

3. Default PDF exports from most tools will include fonts, default Word exports don't. This makes opening Word docs annoying on machines with different fonts (or restricts you to "safe" fonts, which is probably a good thing, but this post is about formats not CV design)

4. Opening PDFs, there's less "junk". Opening Word docs in Word, you see all the squiggles under technical terms and non-Western names, draggable icons on tables, tooltips, etc. When I open someone's CV and Word throws up a bunch of popups about the document containing macros, "objects", fonts I don't have, it puts me in a bad mood for the next few minutes.

5. PDF can certainly be read by CV parsing engines. No question.

6. Having been on the receiving end, in my experience PDF is simply more common. Make the reader's job easier.

And you shouldn't use "doc" anyway, modern versions of Word use docx.

1 comments

I hate word docs, and used to insist my CV as PDF only. I have turned up to interviews only to see the other side having a completely mangled CV in front of them...

But intermediate recruiters love them as they need to add their header to it. They can export and import etc a PDF but it is much more effort so in a famine market like now a PDF is likely to be discarded for the 50 word doc CVs they also received for the same role...