|
|
|
|
|
by Clubber
892 days ago
|
|
You should probably stop reading whatever it is you're reading. Your thought process on this matter is bordering on zealotry. You just suggested destroying infrastructure, which you acknowledge will starve thousands of people to prevent climate change. When questioned on that, your response is that they will die anyway. |
|
There's always the wealth-transfer option if you object to the ethics of property destruction!
The other options are even more homicidal/genocidal/apocalyptic for our civilization—you just aren't obligated to think about it today.