|
|
|
|
|
by alpaca128
893 days ago
|
|
> There are new opportunities in things like e-Ink or transparent screens or IoT that can help people re-focus on the real world around them yet still reap the benefits of technology. This assumption that only games with nice graphics are immersive enough to somehow be a problem is just wrong. Before I had gaming hardware I wasted the exact same amount of time by re-reading books and comics, and it was quite immersive. AAA graphics are not the problem. > humanity has a variety of important engineering problems to solve, and nicer-looking graphics is quite low on that list. That sounds an awful lot like the good old "why do we build space rockets when people are starving". |
|
If so, you are in the minority. For most people, it is easier and more natural to put down a book and go do something else, than it is to quit a video game. Media consumption metrics seem to corroborate this.
> That sounds an awful lot like the good old "why do we build space rockets when people are starving".
If you want to simplify the article this way, sure, but then it's "why do we build ever-more immersive entertainment when we could build space rockets or try to address starvation". I think there's a difference. (And of course, even then we're losing all nuance of the actual article, but I guess there's no way around that.)