[freedomben]

> Not to mention it’s absurd a conversation this long hasn’t pointed out the relativity of ethical judgments or event attempted to define what ethical even means.

I did, but GP dodged it by switching to ad hominem: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38960797

[forward1]

I don't think you know what "ad hominem" means, which somewhat accounts for the difficulty you'd had following this thread.