[wtallis]

"PJ could easily be just a pseudonym used by a panel IBM/Google lawyers"

That's been tried. Nobody has ever offered any evidence that any such thing is the case. Several public figures have stated that they've met a singular female PJ. IBM has denied in open court being behind PJ.

For you to bring this up here is pathetically disengenuous.

Furthermore, most Groklaw articles these days are authored by Mark Webbink, a lawyer and law professor with a well-documented past. He's been in general agreement with PJ on this case, though he's offered less in the way of commentary.