|
|
|
|
|
by gumby
892 days ago
|
|
> The definition of what is a derivative work is IMHO overreaching in GPL based licenses. GPL doesn’t use the word “derive” and specifies modified work in a way that is consistent with the customary legal definition. People twist things around because they want to use GPLed code without “paying” for it, but really at the end of the day it’s just an ordinary license agreement but instead of paying cash to use it you agree to give users the freedom to modify and/or redistribute the code. Just like any other licensed code you can agree to the terms and use the code or disagree with the terms and use something else. |
|
> People twist things around because they want to use GPLed code without “paying” for it, but really at the end of the day it’s just an ordinary license agreement but instead of paying cash to use it you agree to give users the freedom to modify and/or redistribute the code.
You mean, instead of paying cash to use it, you pay with your property (your code). An old school barter exchange.
Source of confusion probably comes from overuse of the word "free" by people promoting GPL, which is like you said, just an ordinary license agreement.