|
|
|
|
|
by carlmr
894 days ago
|
|
>the baseline models they test and blend are really terrible as well. If the effect is there I would guess a few bad models should outperform a mediocre one, and a few mediocre ones should outperform a state-of-the-art one. Of course it would be good to show the same again with GPT4 and maybe 3 GPT3.5 size models, but it's not necessary to show that such an effect exists, and maybe cost prohibitive for them as a research team. Now whether their methodology for proving this effect is correct is another discussion. Personally I don't find these results surprising, our brain is also somewhat compartmentalized, why wouldn't the same hold for a good AI system? The more difficult part is, how do you train these subnetworks optimally. |
|