|
|
|
|
|
by riffraff
895 days ago
|
|
> These writers can use AI and there will be no difference. Another category is autobiographies written by celebrities with no writing skills I would argue this is a common fallacy: I can't do something but I can use automation to do it. But chances are, being unable to do it also means you're unable to judge the result and understand what is right/wrong. This is the standard thing if you try to put together a UI without any design skills, you will use existing components and styles, and it will still look crap. AI will make it easier for people who know how to write to do automated ghost writing, but it won't allow people who can't to do it. |
|
But this fantasy of “people will just dump a prompt into GPT and it will produce a masterpiece (or at least something that a reasonably big audience perceives as good)” is just that: a fantasy.
I am open to change my mind of course once I see a good story written mostly or completely by AI. Sure “good” is subjective but I think no one can argue that the stories produced by AI today are good by any measure - at best they are a passable mimicry of a story that already existed.