[Steko]

I'm impressed you only had to go back 13 months to find a bad quote? If it's all horseshit use the latest column as evidence.

And don't pretend Groklaw's never been wrong in their cheerleading either. They've been expecting the judge to issue summary judgment and tar and feather Oracle's council for the last year.

"He's literally paid by Oracle"

If you'd clicked on my link above you'd see I pointed this out last week.

"That's ok, "both" sides of a story are important, right? "

Quit arguing with straw men. Like I said, I'd prefer an unbiased source.

[parfe]

>I'm impressed you only had to go back 13 months to find a bad quote? If it's all horseshit use the latest column as evidence.

Very well.

How about if Mueller references his own 13 month old horseshit this very day? http://www.fosspatents.com/2012/04/former-sun-chief-about-go... as though it is still a valid theory?

Does it count as an up to date impeachment of your favorite bullshit peddler? Especially because he knows nothing came of his the-sky-is-falling claims regarding the Linux, GPL and Android? And that Linus himself said the claims were crap?

His current article also references another year old prediction he made which turned out to come to nothing as well

http://www.fosspatents.com/2011/03/more-evidence-of-googles-...

It's almost like he spews forth shitty predictions with a specific agenda in mind and doesn't care when his bullshit doesn't pan out because he makes good money by running his mouth.

Then there's this snipe at Jonathan Schwartz: "In yesterday's testimony, Jonathan Schwartz tried to do as much damage to Oracle's case as he could."

that or Schwartz told the truth which just happens to not be in Mueller's employer's favor.

[parfe]

Just the last one I remember.

It's not a straw man. The guy you so plainly think is a legit source for information is literally paid by one of the litigants. May as well be recommending people read Oracle's press releases for some good information.