[johnnyanmac]

sure. and if you ask me as a human brain to copy code I worked with at a previous (non open-source) company line-by-line, I can get myself and current company in trouble. This usually isn't an issue because human brains aren't usually as good at regurgitating exact copies, but it's still pretty much the foundation of copyright.

So why should an artificial brain be treated differently, especially when it's been shown how you can prompt one in a way to almost regurgitate the exact copyright info (similar to how you can prompt a human brain)?