[eru]

> I completely understand that from a historical perspective, just as it was historically the man's sole responsibility to provide financially.

That's only a very small section of history for a specific section of the population.

Poor people always had the women doing lots of work. They had to.

[giantg2]

Even in those times, the women were paid very little. Going back far enough (when women were property), the women weren't even paid, but rather the money was given to the husband. And, of course these things vary for other cultures/countries.

[eru]

Well, depending on how wide you want to cast your net, paid employment (for any gender) is a fairly novel invention.

Women were only 'property' in some societies sometimes.

And I'm not sure there were (m)any instances where women were both considered property, but were also working a paid job where the money went to the husband? I'm afraid you might be mixing up your 'bad old times'?

(I agree that the present is by and large much more pleasant, but not everything bad happened all at once in the same place.)