It's the disingenuous corporate stances, not the content, that are so contemptible. Especially when they adopt them to wield like orthodoxy to isolate and disenfranchise, not uplift, it's clear that they did it for power, not for ethical or equity reasons.
Like the NPR member station that wrongfully fired the disabled Muslim last year. One of his jokes, "Kind of Racist":
“I work at one of these places that’s so woke it’s kinda racist,” the joke reads in part. “Like this lady asked my boss, she’s like ‘Yo, does Jad consider himself a person of color?’ because she was making a list of us. Fucking hell? Sick, alright. I get to be in this lady’s brown dude Pokédex.”
This joke was called “a powerful condemnation, in a funny way, of what [Sleiman] calls corporatized racial consciousness that makes him, a person of color, feel uncomfortable because he would prefer to be categorized as a whole person regardless of the color of his skin.”
He makes another point about not being given the choice of being "white" after 9/11. And now, there's this weird mixed dance somewhere between "we can't depict Koreans as fruit sellers in school books" and "who do we need to enforce labeling on right now to make marketing more valuable over the next 30 years?". NPR seems to want to maintain a moral high ground, and they think this is what sets them apart from their perceived ideological opposition - manufacturing both the demographic and their brand loyalty.
And if you're pirating content you do want you're just informing studios there's no money to be made with it so they certainly won't make more of it.