|
|
|
|
|
by foofie
897 days ago
|
|
> Rust actually is a nice language. C++ requires deciding which features to use? With Rust you have to choose which features to use. Unlike C++, with it's "you pay for what you use" model, Rust's features are arguably still broken, unstable, and under active development. See async rust for example. > don’t know modern C++ but it seems to have a kind of cult like indoctrination where everything else is wrong and only each persons flavor is correct leading to endless bike shedding. Indeed you don't know what you're talking about. Adopting a style guide is not the same thing as joining a cult. C++ has been in active use for around 30 years, and modern C++ for over a decade. People use it just fine, and don't feel the need to evangelize. Other communities sadly still appear to feel a constant need to reassure and convince themselves they didn't made the wrong choice. |
|