Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by ericpauley 898 days ago
Sounds like OP (as with many reading Top-Down) don’t really care about physical layer.
1 comments

Such a hasty generalization. It's not that we don't care about PHY, but expecting in depth PHY treatment in modern networking book is like expecting semiconductor physics in the The Art of Electronics book [1]. Personally PHY is my passion and trying to propose a new reliable PHY waveform to 5G and upcoming 6G standards.

Modern PHY is like bit twiddling in programming, 99% programmer don't do it and don't care unless you are doing HPC or device driver. In networking those who're doing PHY belong to communication engineering field. For modern networking the relevant PHY mostly dealing with digital I/Q signal for wired/wireless and there are many excellent books on the subject such as this [2].

[1]The Art of Electronics (2015):

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38748370

[2] Digital Signal Processing in Modern Communication Systems

https://www.amazon.com/Digital-Signal-Processing-Communicati...