|
|
|
|
|
|
by Eji1700
896 days ago
|
|
|
Well we had this: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/09/us/politics/trump-twitter... (full opinion here): https://int.nyt.com/data/documenthelper/1365-trump-twitter-s... which while resolved, really opens more questions than it solves (which is fine because legislating from the bench shouldn't be the norm...) There need to be very clear laws about how social media and modern tech is used to present information. Hell for the first time the government should have the ability to directly release information and not be reliant on normal privately owned distribution, and that should be investigated as well. This whole thing is a giant can of legal worms anyways, and it only gets worse because our legislative branch has decided to devolve into high school popularity contests and just let the judiciary sort it all out. |
|
|
What laws? “There should be laws about X” is a bunch of words with no substance unless you can say what the laws should, at least in general terms, require and/or prohibit.
> Hell for the first time the government should have the ability to directly release information and not be reliant on normal privately owned distribution
The government is able to do so, and has done for... quite a long time, though until recently wide distribution was a problem. Now, you can get information directly from the websites of most government agencies.
They also release information via private conventional media (via several mechanisms) and social media (via government run accounts), but they aren't exclusively reliant on such media.