[levkk]

The UI is much faster than Github, which is great, big selling point for me. The "iterative change" approach is pretty much how companies use Github I think. Contributors are given push permissions for the repo, the main branch being off limits, and PRs are required an approval before they can be merged. The Github model with forks is not great imo, because forks get out of sync pretty immediately.

Some features I would like to see is ranking of repos by popularity, e.g. "Github stars".