|
|
|
|
|
by philipkglass
892 days ago
|
|
The article only reports number of microplastics without reporting mass. This is particularly difficult to interpret when fibers are responsible for so much of the total: Notably, across all samples, nearly half (44%) of the identified microplastics were fibers, which is consistent with other studies suggesting that fibers are the most prevalent form of microplastic in the environment. Are 4 fibers of 50 micron length 4 times more dangerous than one 200 micron long fiber? There's no discussion of it in the article, but reporting microplastics by number of countable particles carries that implication. |
|