|
|
|
|
|
by freejazz
897 days ago
|
|
>It is not, as explained by your own link. You should read your own link. Registering makes it enormously easier and nearly everyone will register prior to bringing a suit, but it is absolutely not required -- again, as your link clearly explains. Oh so you're making a point about the narrow exceptions that generally don't apply? I'm not going to engage in a bad faith conversation like this. If you are suing over a US work, the only way to bring suit is to have a registration, been refused a registration, or, as you seem to think is an incredibly important distinction, is a VARA work. Do you litigate copyrights? Where exactly are you coming from on this? >Yes they do - in fact the DMCA requires them to do so. No, they wont in the absence proof of ownership of a work which is conventionally reflected in a registered copyright. >The 5 years matters, but yes, this is why your point about registering is entirely without merit. No, it doesn't. |
|