[sacado2]

The issue is that intelligence itself is an ill-defined concept, and an unofficial but broadly-shared rough definition is "what separates humans (and some animals) from unanimated things". So, as soon as a machine can do something (whether it's having good memory, proving things, playing chess, translating texts, drawing a picture, driving a car, anything) it no longer belongs to "intelligence". Using that very definition, AI is an oxymoron.

[Animats]

Amusingly, there's part of the commercial AI community that wants to define intelligence as what companies will pay humans sitting at desks to do.