|
|
|
|
|
by rralian
5169 days ago
|
|
I'm mostly responding to your comment here. "un-minifying or un-obfuscating JavaScript is not a trivial exercise by any means." I think you mean that understanding obfuscated code is not trivial. Un-minifying is certainly trivial. There are tools to do it for you. There's no such thing as un-obfuscating, if you consider that you can't get the original comments or all the semantic naming back. So I'll concede that it's more difficult to read through this obfuscated code than the original. But the original comment in this long thread seems valid to me... that an entirely client side app puts you at much greater risk for cloning than an app with a significant portion of code in back-end, just because your javascript is out there for all to see. |
|