|
|
|
|
|
by chemicalnovae
900 days ago
|
|
> Please, (a) for your own sake and (b) for the sake of open source innovation, use the tool that you admit is better. This is...such a strange take. To follow your logic to an extreme, everyone should use a very small handful of languages that are the "best" in their domain with ne'er a care for their personal comfort or preference. > for your own sake They're sticking with Pandas exactly for their own sake since they like being able to use Copilot. > for the sake of open source innovation Ohh by all means let's all be constantly relearning and rehashing just to follow the latest and greatest in open source innovation this week. Tools are designed to be _used_ and if you like using a tool _and_ it does the job you require of it that seems just fine to me; especially if you're also taking the time to evaluate what else is out there occasionally. |
|
Doubly so if it involves copilot. There's no way to get training data without people writing it. This sound like a direct application of a greedy algorithm: trading long term success for short term gain. That's not the ideal way to live.