|
|
|
|
|
by robatsu
5169 days ago
|
|
Years ago, I worked briefly for The Southern Company, which is the largest publicly held electric utility in the U.S (Georgia Power, Alabama Power, and a bunch of other ones). While there was certainly a lot of expertise in electric generation and transmission there, it rapidly became apparent to me that their true core competency was maintaining and exploiting their legal monopoly. It wasn't a pretty sight. |
|
Imagine a cash-strapped government 50 years ago in an undeveloped country wanting to build electricity infrastructure. The country's economic growth is stagnating because of a lack of infrastructure and there are few foreign investments because the country's economic growth is stagnating. If a foreign company DID choose to invest in electricity, and the investment was profitable, other foreign companies will jump in to compete; but if the investment was unprofitable, the company would just have lost a large chunk of cash. Therefore it was always more profitable to simply wait for another company to make the investment, and then see if electricity will be a profitable business in the country before making investment itself.
These catch-22's mean the government has little choice but to allow the first foreign company a local monopoly, at least for a limited time.
I'm just theorising all this out of thin air, though.