|
|
|
|
|
by gregmac
897 days ago
|
|
It wasn't long ago when TLS was not the norm and many, many sites were served over plain HTTP, even when they accepted logins or contained other sensitive data. There's a good chance this decision was a trade-off to make TLS simpler to get working in order to get more sites using it. Browsers have a long history of accepting bad data, including malformed headers, invalid HTML, and maintaining workarounds for long-since-fixed bugs. This isn't really that different. |
|
If it actually is, I am ready to eat my words, but the actual blame would be on the webserver developers then. Default settings should be boring, but secure; advanced configuration should be approachable; and dangerous settings should require the admin to jump through hoops.