[iteria]

We don't actually know that children were barely affected by covid. Covid is a pretty unknown disease in the long term. It could be like chicken pox which looked harmless in children until a few decades later with shingles. Maybe we'll find out that having young co-relates with later adult outcomes like how having multiple serious bouts of the flu qas corelated with mental decline. We don't even know if covid would be like the flu when it first appeared where future waves would be worse in children. It's best to be cautious with a disease that still hasn't settled into a stable form.

[jzackpete]

Pascal's wager. Masking and isolating children has a known cost, your speculative consequences don't

[JoeAltmaier]

Sure they do: children might live lives of weakness and disability, even die.

That risk elicits a disproportionate response in rational people. Dismissing it is useless.

[jzackpete]

I'll dismiss it until the risk is quantified, because all I've heard is "might" and "maybe" when it comes to long term effects. Then compare that quantified risk to the precautions required to avoid being infected (i.e. a lot more than what was done, because everyone still got it) and there's your actual rational response.

[JoeAltmaier]

Again, go ahead and dismiss it. And see how far you get. Zero, that's how far.