[pixl97]

I mean an evolutionary tree where intelligence features are added in some branches makes sense.

I guess part of what I was trying to address is that we like to think of intelligence as what people do and are the pinnacle of, and discounting anything that is not covered by that.

[__MatrixMan__]

I definitely agree that defining intelligence as what humans do is a problematic practice. I guess I just wanted to nit pick a little.

There's definitely a lot of "it's not real intelligence because it's not human intelligence" going around these days. Doesn't seem like it's going anywhere useful though.