|
|
|
|
|
by dotnet00
893 days ago
|
|
A friend who recently finished her PhD had a similar experience, where all the senior scientists at our lab were concerned because her thesis was "only" 100 pages long and she didn't go through a professional editor to have it perfected. My preliminary defense thesis had to be 50+ pages, but during the presentation, it was pretty obvious that the committee had at best looked at the table of contents. It all feels like such an unnecessary waste of effort. Even with my own thesis, over half of it is just padding with very fundamental background information because the work isn't really so complicated as to require that many pages to discuss, it's just demonstrating more advanced simulation capabilities by implementing GPU acceleration for a niche but simulation heavy field. |
|
I clearly stated that I would not waste my time and the reviewers are free to provide comments and we will see during the defense.
I found out that a lot of these "rules" are traditions that one can challenge and suddenly they are not traditions anymore.