[wkat4242]

> They were legally unable to intervene, without risking prosecution.

They should have done so anyway, obviously. There's no chance they would have been prosecuted for it. Not with all the uproar. I walked in the candlelight demonstrations too.

> And that case was a major reason that the constitution was changed to prevent this ever happening again.

Only after a referendum which the church opposed, and it's still one of the most restrictive countries in terms of abortion.

[disgruntledphd2]

> They should have done so anyway, obviously. There's no chance they would have been prosecuted for it. Not with all the uproar. I walked in the candlelight demonstrations too.

Can you give me some evidence that you're willing to destroy your career in a country on a point of principle?

Like, I completely agree that they should have done that, but that's pretty easy for me to say, it wouldn't be my career on the line.

> Only after a referendum which the church opposed, and it's still one of the most restrictive countries in terms of abortion.

Look man, my wife had a missed miscarraige under the old rules, and I completely agree, but at least that shit won't happen anymore. I did query this with our fertility consultant about what would happen if we were past 12 weeks and got a seriously bad genetic test result, and he just shrugged and said we could go to England, which was pretty disappointing, post referendum.