[kruft]

About a decade ago, we’d refer to LinkedIn as “the network everyone has, but nobody is on.” Meaning, everyone has an account but there’s no reason to log in unless you’re seeking an employment change. Looks like they tripled-down on features to change it. Always seeking DAU.

[rantallion]

> Looks like they tripled-down on features to change it. Always seeking DAU.

The irony is that all the extra nonsense keeps a lot of us away even more. I think even the next time I want to change jobs, there are platforms I'll use before I go back to LinkedIn.

I guess it's like any social media platform. Once you invite too many people, you dilute the original purpose and community, and just end up with memes and cat photos.

[ethbr1]

LinkedIn is like certifications now:

There's an entire industry around claiming it's important, using it, optimizing it, etc.

But all of that is orthogonal to getting actual work done and the skills to do so.

... or in other words, LinkedIn is what would have happened to Craigslist, if CL had decided they wanted people to spend more time on the site, instead of concluding their business as quickly as possible.

[erikerikson]

> there are platforms I'll use

Citation needed.

Seriously though, what alternatives should we consider?

[rantallion]

Not sure what geographies it covers as I've only used it for UK-based roles, but I love the experience on cord.co.

It's what I believe recruiting should be. Potential applicants upload their bio and skills, say what they're interested in (in terms of salary range, WFH vs WFO, etc). Potential recruiters list jobs, with somewhat decent transparency (at least for the UK, where salary is rarely listed). Then one party or the other initiates a conversation.

The best applications I've been through all started via cord, and the interactions all felt genuine and were all with internal recruiters rather than agencies.

[erikerikson]

Thanks for sharing, that is a pretty cool tool. Seems like it'd lead to more meaningful discussions. It'd be nice if there were more roles available but it seems like it might have a higher bar of entry in support of higher expected quality.

[bluefirebrand]

> I think even the next time I want to change jobs, there are platforms I'll use before I go back to LinkedIn.

Like what? I'm genuinely curious because I've found my last two jobs through LinkedIn recruiters and I would like to know if there's a better platform out there to be my digital resume / recruiter spam dumping ground

[ksjskskskkk]

linkedin wishes it was all meme and cat photos.

[trog]

There is a massive reason for some people to log on which seems fairly new (last few years) : b2b sales.

I watch our sales people use LinkedIn heavily for prospecting and cold reach outs. They rely on tools like Lusha which are basically databases of contact information that are sold on a subscription basis.

If you work in management or any sort of position where it's possible you're involved in procurement and that is reflected in your job title you will get hounded incessantly by people - sometimes directly on LinkedIn but more often they /found/ you on LinkedIn and then paid Lusha or one of the other contact database tools for your email address and contact info.

Fwiw you can opt out of Lusha. I tried it and the number of inbound calls and emails I got dropped significantly.