|
|
|
|
|
by deadghost
898 days ago
|
|
I've been reading two hours a day consistently for the past half year. I generally read with purpose and settled into a daily routine of reading a book on business, a book on programming, and a book for fun. It works for me. I also found that non-fiction is more interesting than fiction. Fiction needs to be believable, non-fiction doesn't. Non-fiction captures a complex, layered reality with characters that are often at odds with others and even themselves. Sometimes they randomly died off, sometimes they show up again in unexpected places. A fiction author would have to be an absolute master to create such a complex world. |
|
I suggest looking into some better-known fiction writers from the past, as my experience has been entirely the opposite to yours. I find good fiction to be infinitely better at creating complex realities, whereas nonfiction tends to all operate from the same contemporary pseudo-omniscient viewpoint.
I happened to be listening to this podcast this morning, which is actually about the exact topic of fiction and history:
https://www.laphamsquarterly.org/roundtable/fiction-history
It's about Joseph Conrad, whom I definitely recommend as a writer worth reading.