This is funny - you mention two opposite cases and in the end give an example to one of the cases without explaining to which exactly. Is it on purpose?
The GP probably does, but it is kind of funny that they chose a really bad example of an expert. In light of the replication crisis, "Thinking - fast and slow" has been heavily criticised, and rightfully so.
In my opinion, it belongs more in the pop-sci category more usually written by non-experts.