There is so much variation confounding any study, in tasks, specifications, programmer inclination.
I use both staticly typed (rust) and dynamically typed (perl) a lot. I like rust for the big projects and perl to hold everything together-job control
That is my inclination, not a fact.
I have used many languages over the years. Static/dynamic typing is just one dimension, and not necessarily related to quality
Except for the documentation effect. For that there is apparently solid research.
There is so much variation confounding any study, in tasks, specifications, programmer inclination.
I use both staticly typed (rust) and dynamically typed (perl) a lot. I like rust for the big projects and perl to hold everything together-job control
That is my inclination, not a fact.
I have used many languages over the years. Static/dynamic typing is just one dimension, and not necessarily related to quality