Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by firen777 899 days ago
The way I look at it is, password vault is a single point of failure with a very VERY tiny attack surface that attacker will need to directly target you with a sniper rifle to actually hit you (assuming you are not using things like Lastpass. I personally use Keepass and synchronize the local vault across devices using Syncthing). Suffice to say, unless your last name is Snowden, it should not be a concern to you.

Comparing to the common way of "managing" password (i.e. reusing one password everywhere), it is still a single point of failure. The difference is the attack surface balloons up in proportion to the number of website you sign up to. And just like a balloon, all it need is one poke, one website storing your password in plaintext to blow it all up.

1 comments

> Suffice to say, unless your last name is Snowden, it should not be a concern to you.

I wouldn't be so sure about that. People store banking/payment credentials in them, so there is a large incentive to mount a scalable attack against an even moderately popular password manager. Crypto wallets are a popular target too for the same reason (although the risk is even more immediate there).

How are you going to "mount a scalable attack" against a local-only password manager?
Malware targeting unlocked local password managers would be one option.
In that case aren't you already hosed because the same malware can steal all your login sessions?
no because I'm not logged into all of my accounts at once but if they can open the PW database they can