|
|
|
|
|
by aslilac
895 days ago
|
|
not to be the “but rust” person, but I’m curious why Rust wasn’t in the test group. it seems to meet all their criteria, though the community was a bit smaller back then. Go is a perfectly reasonable choice though, and easier to learn on average. |
|
But when I read the following:
What I understand is that they did not really wanted to do a real benchmark but they decided to use Go first, and then they had to setup a kind of "bullshit neutral study" to pretend to leadership that Go was the best choice for all the languages that could fit the job.Maybe it is the case in the end for them, but it is another subject.