|
|
|
|
|
by lotsofpulp
905 days ago
|
|
I am sure McKinsey has lots of technically inclined people too, but if we consider back when Bezos was working at DE Shaw (early 1990s), almost all of the (few) employees must have been highly technical (it is considered the first quant fund), while McKinsey's headcount was already 2,900 when Bezos left DE Shaw. Today it is 2,500 people versus 45,000 people, and I would guess it is still probably true that a greater proportion of DE Shaw is technical than McKinsey. |
|
An Petroleum Engineer, Materials Engineer, Industrial Engineer, Chemical Engineer, Biopharmaceuticals Researcher, etc will always have the option to work at an MBB, as those industries heavily use McK to help with their own businesses.
On top of that, McK hiring even at the undergrad level skews STEM. If you attend a feeder school like MIT, Stanford, or Berkeley, it's EECS/Applied Math/Physics majors that land Associate interviews, because management is much more technical now. McKinsey literally has recruiters devoted only to candidates from Berkeley and UMich Engineering for strategy roles.
It isn't the 1980s anymore when some random schmoe with an Econ or Business degree can land an MBB role anymore.