[sjsdaiuasgdia]

You put "but a trend in general" in front of your link, which describes one specific event.

Your arguments might land better if you put out some evidence of a trend. So far you've implied a trend among vegan influencers, abandonded that point when it was pointed out that one data point isn't much of a trend, moved the goalposts to say it's a trend among the general population of vegan people, and then linked an article with a single data point. There's plenty of isolated examples of non-vegans starving their children to death, so an isolated example of a vegan starving their child is not particularly useful or informative.

For the record, I fucking love steak, I'm not coming at this from the vegan perspective. I do have a pet peeve against overly broad statements, though.

[graphe]

Vegans having malnutrition is more common than it is not. This vegan killed their child giving them vegan food. This is what is happening on a broad scale. The mother being careful had fed them a diet that's killed them. You didn't read the article; she starved him by carefully feeding him vegan food.

[callalex]

If it was on a broad scale then surely it would be easy for you to provide some evidence after being asked nicely 3 separate times?

[sjsdaiuasgdia]

Again, non-vegans neglect the hell out of their children all the time. This person clearly criminally neglected their child, and was arrested and convicted.

You're not showing a trend with your evidence, but you are showing your prejudices with how you present the evidence you are bringing.

(late reply because lol, lmao if you comment on HN when not working)

[graphe]

Forcing your children to eat only vegetables is not neglect it's abuse and causes death.