|
|
|
|
|
by epistasis
900 days ago
|
|
Do you have any studies, review papers, or other evidence of this? There is no increase of organic farming on these fields in Minnesota, yet wildlife is coming back. Other interventions around habitat preservation and restoration, and decreased runoff, seem far more crucial. Even organic farms use fertilizer, the runoff of which is far bigger contributor to ecosystem destruction than pesticides, at least according to everything I have seen. Algeal blooms and water ecosystem destruction are caused by excess nutrients, not from death by pesticides, for example. I would love to see soemthing new that I have not yet been able to find with regards to this evidence! |
|
Of course there are other million ways to harm birds. Don't make me start talking about Malta or Lebanon hunters. Maltese poachers kill or capture up to 200,000 migratory wild birds every year
And is much worse. The ciphers of illegal hunting are sobbing. Between 11 and 36 millions! of migratory birds could be killed on the entire Mediterranean each year: raptors, storks, falcons, herons, anything with feathers, protected or not
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/c...
... but the problem here are the farms, sure.
> Even organic farms use fertilizer, the runoff of which is far bigger contributor to ecosystem destruction than pesticides
So it is a tie? Organic farms use fertilizers, bad. Other farms use fertilizers, equally bad.
The difference is that hedges and nature tolerated around organic farms acts as a buffer in part eating part of this effluent. This may not apply necessarily in other farms.