| I think I agree that the nuance is lost with our voting system. It becomes about perspective at some point. The conservatives are seen as "tough on migration" but the mechanisms with which they are seen that way are actually "tough on lower classes". Thus when someone wants to vote against migration they wind up voting based on perspective. It's also funny to consider the sorry state of the liberal democrats. With the risk of your prior perspective of things being somewhat hardened; this is the reality of what happened: * Lib Dems campaigned on a platform of an alternative voting mechanism and of freezing university caps. * No clear majority in the GE * Coalition government is floated, Conservative leader David Cameron says "join me and we will abide one of your major campaign pledges, you can pick which one". * Lib dems join, pick alternative voting, as it has the best chance of doing the most good in the future. * Conservatives employ the most underhanded tactics (using the same ad agency as Vote Leave fwiw) to undermine the referendum they hold. "This baby doesn't need an alternative voting system, they need a life support system" etc; * Referendum fails * Lib Dems come out as traitors for betraying their pledge to freeze university fees'. * Nobody will seriously vote Lib Dem now because of this, instead preferring to vote for a party consistently embroiled in scandals after scandals. Thus: we are perpetually stuck in a "lesser evil" voting system, and it's easy to completely decimate the other side by either eating a bacon sandwich wrong or making a choice that was intended to break this horrible situation. Everyone loses, A/V is considered unpalatable due to the failed referendum. |
Couldn’t respond to others in this comment chain for some reason but fwiw I think politics in my country (Germany) are equally insane at times if not more so…