[jimmaswell]

I can give Copilot instructions in plain English to not only generate working code, but modify a file any arbitrary way, and someone hooked up Unity3D a while ago to put commands through ChatGPT and it responded correctly to instructions like "put ten cubes in the scene and make half of them red" - all far beyond a glorified phone tree like Siri, this was science fiction a few years ago. We're seeing the birth of the Star Trek bridge computer, and this is only a small subset of current AI. The best-faith end game of crypto is decentralized and free-as-in-freedom money and digital asset ownership, which is nice, but not nearly as game changing as what AI has already done and shows promise to do.

[randomdata]

To date, Copilot and ChatGPT are just 'better' programming languages. Everything you describe could already be done using other languages, albeit languages that are more esoteric.

It is likely that these tools can make most everyone a programmer, like how improved elevator designs has made everyone an elevator operator. But how game changing is that, really? Tools like Excel have already made great strides in that direction, and with coding now standard fare in public school curriculums, everyone being a programmer is a game already well underway.

[MeImCounting]

I am an AI optimist. I think that transformer models and improved computer vision will absolutely change society for the better. As will any other useful tools we add to our toolbox. I do not think it will be some paradigm shift or revolutionary new thing like the internet or like the printing press. Something closer to good touchscreens, or wireless connections that just work. Useful enough to become ubiquitous but not enough to totally change the landscape of human experience.