[korginator]

Add this point from the article for context: "This retraction is Tessier-Lavigne’s fourth in as many months, a stunning turn of events for a researcher of his stature."

That begs the question, how did at least four such cutting-edge research works with fabricated data and results go through the review process unscathed?

[ekianjo]

You just discovered that the peer review process is a big farce. Well done.

[wolverine876]

There's no evidence of fabricated data, afaik. (That's your own fabrication, apparently.)

[bryan0]

Here’s some of the evidence of data manipulation: https://stanforddaily.com/2022/11/29/stanford-presidents-res...

[wolverine876]

Thanks. Clearly there are (or were at the time of the article) serious allegations that it is a possibility.