|
|
|
|
|
|
by dumpsterlid
902 days ago
|
|
|
yawn I’m sorry but why do we need a corporation to profit off of the social network we use? I am not excited for any new corporate social network because after using mastodon and lemmy it has become crystal clear that social networks as a “technology” are a terrible business. Either you make a social network healthy for its users or you profit off of them. Pick one. It is like the concept of hospitals being privatized businesses. It is insane when you step back and actually think about it. Do I want the doctors, nurses, janitors and staff to get paid for doing hard work at the hospital? Absolutely! Why does an abstract entity, the financial instrument of a private hospital, need to profit off of my care? Hey I see a bright future for companies selling the service of turnkey lemmy, mastodon, pixelfed and peertube instances so maybe Facebook can get into that and be a nice little small reasonable company helping instance admins out instead of a monstrously poorly run corporation that tears apart the social fabric of society for profit. :) edit wait did this article seriously just call the guy running the open source project mastodon, “CEO”…? |
|
|
That is his title [0]. Other places calling him CEO include Flipboard's interview with him [1], and various tech articles [2].
[0]: His LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/gargron/
[1]: https://about.flipboard.com/inside-flipboard/eugen-rochko/
[2]: https://www.wired.com/story/the-man-behind-mastodon-eugen-ro... and https://www.theverge.com/23658648/mastodon-ceo-twitter-inter...