[grumpyprole]

We don't really know what the split was. SBF has claimed he donated significantly more to the republicans. From your link above:

The GOP donations were "dark-money" contributions, making his claim difficult to verify. Such secret contributions, allowed by the Supreme Court’s 2010 Citizens United ruling, wouldn’t show up in the FEC disclosures used to compile MarketWatch’s list

[bhelkey]

> SBF has claimed

I put little weight on the words of a convicted fraudster who is in jail awaiting sentencing.

[grumpyprole]

What would he have to gain by lying about spending even more customer money? I see it as a boast of how well he was playing the game; and also an admission that he was trying to buy influence.

[bhelkey]

If he primarily donated to one party, the donations advance Sam's political views.

If he equally donated to both parties, the donations advance FTX's interests.

I believe that Sam would advance his own interests then lie to make himself appear neutral.

[grumpyprole]

Yes I concede this is possible too.