| > Given that at no point did I point to our "brilliance", I assumed you refererring to my pointing to tacit knowledge I deduced it from your general tone. But you're probably right that the tacit was part of it. > Have you seen our code? No, but it was a general comment, hinted by providing the redis source code as an example. > and presumption. Yes, it was prejudicial, as stated. I hope I'm wrong. > You and I have two different ideas of expertise and software design and they are irreconciable. Agree. > Maybe in 15 years you can look back on this conversation and recognize that there was always land beyond the horizon. Or maybe not. You are the doctor that is refusing to wash his hands before surgery because you still believe in bad humors. There are things you do not know, and you are stubbornly refusing to recognize them. And here's why I said your arrogance would make it unfruitful. Because in the end you're of course objectively right, and I'm objectively wrong and will see my errors in due time. Sigh. > Thankfully, we do not work together and we will be unlikely to cross paths again in the future. The feeling is mutual! |