|
|
|
|
|
by defrost
896 days ago
|
|
The argument being made is that solar and wind aren't "emission free" .. that they don't waft into our neighbourhood from trees in our backyard. Everybody (one would hope) understands that about coal, oil, and natural gas. Many people (it seems) overlook that for wind, solar, and battery technology. It's akin to ignoring | being wilfully ignorant of what happens to material in the recycle bin. Think of it more as a plea to remember that all this clean energy comes with a boatload of waste that needs addressing, that is often in other people's backyards, and the you don't get $64 billion US worth of copper without the digging up of what some consider to be sacred ground. |
|
What is the action this realization is supposed to help us come to though? Should we stop the transition to cleaner energy until we find a 100% clean energy source throughout its life cycle before we begin the transition? It is simple really. Wind, solar, and so on are cleaner than fossil fuel sources of energy, so we should gradually transition to them. Cleaner mining and responsible recycling and reuse of the infra we build can be worked on over time.