[soerxpso]

> But it's important to remember that no copyright at all would hurt small and medium creators immensely.

This doesn't refute the tweet. You're just saying you want a monetization strategy that enables an information business model that you like (small/medium creators) instead of one that you don't like. It's still not a moral right, and your belief that the law should help artists is not innately superior to a belief that the law should help Disney or that the law should help corn farmers.

Additionally, it's arguable that copyright is needed for small/medium creators to succeed. Most successful independent creators monetize through patreon or personal commissions, neither of which are actually hindered by lack of copyright.

[PH95VuimJjqBqy]

nowhere in that commenters post did they mention preference, they made an observation. You're the one trying to apply feelings to it.

[dventimi]

It's not so much an observation as it is a claim. You can't observe something that isn't there, after all.